Topics Assembly of the Drug Evaluation Committee for FY2022 Paving the way to the future of healthcare through Digital Transformation! ~From Disease to Pre-disease and Well being

Printable PDF

The 141st Assembly of the Drug Evaluation Committee was held on November 25, 2022 at Muromachi Mitsui Hall & Conference (Chuo-ku, Tokyo). Considering the transmission of the new coronavirus, approximately 40 JPMA executives and Drug Evaluation Committee members attended the meeting at the venue, while approximately 630 others participated online.

 The venue The venue

The Assembly began with an explanation of the purpose of the Assembly by Mr. Kazuhiko Mori, Executive Director of JPMA. After the external lecture, the activities of digital transformation (DX) being undertaken by the JPMA Drug Evaluation Committee's subcommittees and committee task forces (TFs) were introduced. In the panel discussion, the challenges and future of Drug Evaluation Committee's DX were also discussed, providing an opportunity for future initiatives. Finally, the four-hour Assembly ended with closing remarks by Drug Evaluation Committee Chairperson Manabu Yanagisawa.

Part 1

■External Speeches

Realizing a Sustainable Future through Digital Innovation

Mr. Hiroshi Nishikawa, Senior Director, Communication Strategy Management Division, Fujitsu

Since 2013, Fujitsu has annually published the Fujitsu Technology and Service Vision (FT&SV), which presents a vision of the future that the company wants to realize and proposes how technology can contribute to its realization. The vision also serves as a compass for all Fujitsu employees.

In response to the fact that the next decade will be marked by declining diversity, climate change, persistence of the new coronavirus, and further expansion of poverty and education issues on a global scale, Fujitsu is working to achieve its sustainability transformation through digital innovation technologies.

 Mr. Hiroshi Nishikawa, Senior Director, Communication Strategy Management Division, Fujitsu

An analysis of the results of a survey of 1,800 business leaders in nine countries to examine trends around the world showed that although sustainability is recognized as an important management issue, its realization varied. Among them, successful companies have defined a corporate purpose (leadership that the CEO personally and passionately encourages employees to follow), and based on that purpose, they are building a human-centric (empowering employees), data-driven (using data and digital technology), and connected (an ecosystem in which people, goods, and services (building an ecosystem in which people, goods, and services are connected safely and securely).

Based on these, in 2020, Fujitsu has set its Purpose as "bringing trust to society through innovation and making the world more sustainable," and has set three goals: (1) a "borderless world" where the real and digital worlds converge, (2) a "dynamic resilience" where the uncertain future is predicted with the digital twin, and (3) a "dynamic resilience" where the uncertain future is predicted with the digital twin. (3) "Discovery Revolution" using quantum computers and AI, and (4) "Trust for All" using decentralized trust technology to protect the borderless world. The company will invest in "Computing" such as the development of quantum computers, "Network" such as 5G and 6G wireless technologies, "AI" such as the ability to infer causal relationships from ultra-large scale data, "Data&Security" such as distributed ID technologies, and "Converging Technologies" such as the construction of real-time digital twin infrastructures. We are investing in "AI" (e.g., inferring cause-and-effect relationships from data), "Data&Security" (e.g., distributed ID technology), and "Converging" (e.g., real-time digital twin infrastructure) to realize Purpose. Furthermore, we have launched "Fujitsu Uvance" to promote sustainability transformation by connecting people, products, and ideas.

Part 2

The following eight DX activities, etc., being undertaken by the JPMA Drug Evaluation Committee's subcommittees and committee TFs, were explained.

  1. 1.
    Task Force for Promotion of Utilization of Medical Information DB Mr. Jisei Aoki, Leader
    To promote the utilization of medical information databases, activities are focused on the improvement of infrastructure, including the improvement of personal information protection legislation, such as data structure discrepancies and consent, which is currently an issue.
  2. 2.
    Basic Research Subcommittee Mutsuzuki Suzuki, Chair
    Structuring and databasing data generated in non-clinical areas to examine the possibility of using SEND data, background data from past toxicity studies as a control group, and AI pathology judgment.
  3. 3.
    Tomoyuki Tabata, Vice Chair, Clinical Evaluation Subcommittee
    Introduction of the results of studies on issues such as utilization of real world data (RWD)/registry, examination of clinical trial methods that do not depend on visits to medical institutions, and utilization of digital health.
  4. 4.
    Makoto Miyazaki, Chair, Pharmacovigilance Subcommittee
    Development and review of DX activities, including publication of remote investigation (reexamination) guidance, creation of detailed survey forms for adverse drug reactions using electronic forms (PDF) instead of paper, improvement of access to information and drug risk management plan (RMP) materials for patients through DX, and corporate Bold future vision of pharmacovigilance in the pharmaceutical industry.
  5. 5.
    Satoru TSUCHIYA, Vice Chairman, Data Science Subcommittee
    Through the activities of "Model-informed drug development," a drug evaluation that uses models to help speculate on the future, and ICH M11, which examines the international standardization of protocols, we will introduce a future where content can be easily reused in other documents, such as analysis plans and summary reports. The future of the protocol will be introduced through the activities of ICH M11, which is studying the international standardization of protocols.
  6. 6.
    Electronic Standard for Medical Information Expert Committee Miki Someya, Leader
    Introduced eConsent, convenience of eTMF metrics, status of ePRO introduction, status of IoT use in clinical trials, and future issues.
  7. 7.
    Medical Affairs Subcommittee Yutaro Wakamura, Vice Chair
    Through the draft guidance on "Provision of Medical and Scientific Information" by medical departments, the status of digital utilization (Digitation, Digitalization) according to the types and methods of information to be considered in medical and scientific information and current issues. The future prospects for DX are also introduced.
  8. 8.
    DX Study Task Force: Ken Kaiabe, Executive Director
    Sharing of the need to accelerate DX efforts by member companies and stakeholders by comparing DX efforts by the Drug Evaluation Committee with the goals of individual companies and making environmental improvements and policy recommendations. Presented the need to promote DX activities to realize the future need for prevention and health maintenance efforts, not only after a disease has occurred.

Part 3

A panel discussion was held with JPMA Executive Director Kazuhiko Mori and Drug Evaluation Committee Vice Chairperson Toshiharu Sano as Chairpersons, with Mr. Nishikawa, Steering Secretary Kaibe, Leader Aoki, Chairperson Miyazaki, as well as Clinical Evaluation Committee Chairperson Hiroshi Matsuzawa as panelists.

The theme of this Assembly was "What DX can do for Well Being without being bound by existing frameworks," and the discussion focused on what DX can be used for and for whom and what it can provide. The discussion began with an explanation of the purpose of the event, which was to provide an opportunity to think about DX in drug development. Citing the change in the rules of Major League Baseball due to the emergence of Shohei Ohtani, a major leaguer who transcended existing frameworks, the possibility of rules and regulations changing due to the emergence of new digital technologies was discussed.

Panelists suggested that clinical trials that do not depend on visits to medical institutions may become a reality with the advent of online medical care, wearable devices, etc., and that in the future it may be possible to participate in necessary clinical trials anywhere in the world. Some suggested that connecting clinical trials to a site that can manage disease treatment guidelines will promote access to clinical trials, and that if post-marketing safety surveillance becomes smarter with the advancement of DX, clinical development may be approved at an earlier stage, and smart post-marketing safety surveillance may be able to take on the remaining challenges.

On the other hand, there was also the opinion that whether or not to tolerate an overly monitored society may differ from person to person. As a solution to this problem, the need for the development of technology that can identify the intentions of individuals and obtain their consent was proposed.

In the drug evaluation process, the Japanese regulatory authorities, unlike their global counterparts, require documents to be written in Japanese, and there is a language barrier. In addition, the discussion focused on the issue of personal data and whether or not users are aware of the advantages of using personal data in different ways, such as the fact that search engines do not require strict regulation even though the data is used for other purposes, while the rate of acquisition of personal number cards has not increased. There was a shared recognition that whether or not the benefits are perceived to be beneficial may be different. This point is considered to be an important element in future discussions on the construction of medical information databases.

Finally, the panel discussion concluded with the common recognition that the definition of "well being" that pharmaceutical companies aim for is not a simple one, and that it is necessary to give detailed consideration to it, and that DX has the potential to provide new value to this definition.

 Panel discussion Panel discussion

( Takayuki Imaeda, Vice Chairperson, Drug Evaluation Committee)

Share this page

TOP