Top News The 7th Nikkei-FT Conference on Infectious Diseases" held as a Pharmaceutical Association of Japan lunch session. Recommendations to strengthen future infectious disease control through industry-academia-government collaboration

Printable PDF

The worldwide spread of novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) is having a tremendous impact on global society and the economy. On June 17, 2020, the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of Japan (PMAJ) compiled and disseminated the "PMAJ Proposal for the Creation of Therapeutic Agents and Vaccines for Infectious Diseases". The proposal is designed to overcome the challenges of preparing for future unknown infectious diseases, while promoting activities based on a strong awareness of our mission as an R&D-oriented pharmaceutical company, which is the early creation of treatments and vaccines and the stable supply of pharmaceutical products. The proposal emphasizes the importance of further collaboration between industry, academia, and government in order to strengthen infectious disease countermeasures in Japan. The Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of Japan (PMAJ) is working to realize the proposal, and as part of this effort, participated in the "7th Nikkei-FT Conference on Infectious Diseases" (online conference format) and held a PMAJ lunch session on November 7, the second day of the conference. In this session, key persons from industry, academia, and government presented information on how Japan should respond in the future for the rapid discovery and supply of drugs and vaccines for infectious diseases, preparedness in normal times, necessary functions, international cooperation, and other issues.

The venue

In the Pharmaceutical Cooperative Association lunch session, lectures were given from the standpoints of industry, academia, and government on current efforts and future collaboration to strengthen infectious disease countermeasures, followed by a discussion session in which the speakers served as panelists.

First, from the standpoint of academia, Dr. Kazuhiro Tatenda, President of the Japanese Society of Infectious Diseases and Professor of Toho University School of Medicine, gave a presentation on the threat of infectious diseases, particularly drug resistance (AMR), and the importance of being prepared at ordinary times under the theme of international collaboration for the establishment of new treatment methods and vaccine creation. Next, Mr. Tadaaki Shobayashi, Director General of the Health Bureau of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, gave an explanation on the measures against COVID-19, which the government is promoting as a whole, and the importance of industry-academia-government collaboration and international cooperation in this effort. Next, Ms. Mihoko Kashiwagura, Resident Representative of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in Japan, gave a presentation on international industry-academia-government collaboration in the fight against infectious diseases during a pandemic, and on the image and expectations of Japan as seen from overseas. Finally, Mr. Joji Nakayama, Chairman of the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of Japan (PMAJ), gave a presentation on the ideal form of industry-academia-government collaboration in global infectious disease control and what to expect.

The following is a recap of each speaker's presentation.

International Collaboration and Industry-Academia-Government Collaboration for Establishment of New Therapeutic Methods and Creation of Vaccines Focusing on AMR (drug resistance) countermeasures

Dr. Kazuhiro Tateda, President of the Japanese Society of Infectious Diseases and Professor, Toho University School of Medicine

In Japan, an action plan for AMR measures up to 2020 was formulated in 2016, and efforts have been promoted. This year, it is time to evaluate and reconsider the past five years. One of the directions in the Action Plan that we should take with regard to infectious diseases is "research and development of diagnostic methods and therapeutic drugs," but unfortunately we have not made sufficient progress in this area. One of the reasons for this is the business principle. Compared to drugs in the fields of oncology, respiratory medicine, and dermatology, infectious disease drugs are not profitable even if they are discovered, making it difficult for companies to advance their business. At the same time, however, the problem of resistant bacteria is steadily progressing in clinical practice, to the extent that it has been called a silent pandemic. We are faced with this dilemma. How can we solve this problem?

In the U.S., the "10 x '20 initiative" was announced in 2010, which set the direction for the creation of 10 new antimicrobial agents by 2020, and the government has taken the lead in this initiative. Meanwhile, in Japan, the Science Council of Japan handed a proposal to the government at the G8 Summit in 2013. The proposal states, "The problem of resistant bacteria is a threat to humanity, and should be considered a crisis management issue and addressed. However, despite such efforts, progress has been slow.

The problems with antimicrobial agents from a business perspective, namely, the extremely high cost of drug discovery research and development and the fact that the business model does not generate profits even after the product is launched, make it important to create incentives through cooperation between industry, academia, and government to make the business function well in the future. It will be important to create incentives through cooperation between industry, academia, and government to make it work as a business. Incentives include push-type incentives at the R&D stage and pull-type incentives after the product is launched. In particular, it has recently been discussed that pull-type incentives should be successfully created to promote difficult drug discovery. This problem cannot be solved by science alone. People from science (academia), economics (industry), regulatory (government), and other fields are joining together to discuss how to promote the development of necessary drugs to treat resistant bacteria.

In Japan, push-type projects for the development of drugs for infectious diseases are being promoted by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) through the Creation of Innovative Infrastructure for Clinical Research and Development (CiCLE) project, but pull-type incentives are unfortunately still not yet in sight. After various discussions at the Nikkei-FT Conference on Infectious Diseases, we are finally beginning to see a form for these incentives.

The AMR problem is of such a nature that it is a silent pandemic and if we do not move now, we will be in serious trouble. This is exactly the kind of problem that needs to be promoted through collaboration between industry, academia, and government from a crisis management perspective. And AMR is a global problem, and we must consider global data sharing as a One Health issue. And it is also important to note that the direction of drug discovery is changing with the evolution of diagnostic methods. Diagnosis of infectious diseases, which used to take two or three days, can now be done in 30 minutes to determine bacterial resistance. In part, this change has been driven by the response to COVID-19. With this type of technology, it makes sense to continue developing very strong antimicrobials, even if the therapeutic target is narrow. This is another important direction. Another important direction is that, although the main focus of drugs for infectious diseases has been on bactericidal activity against microorganisms, as we learned in COVID-19, there is a possibility that inhibiting the cytokine storm on the host side will lead to treatment. I believe that "Host-directed Molecular Targeted Therapy" is the direction of future development.

Strengthening measures against infectious diseases through PPP (Public Private Partnership) Toward rapid supply of therapeutic drugs and vaccines

Tadaaki Masabayashi, Director-General, Health Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

The focus is now on drugs for infectious diseases, especially COVID-19, but what must we do as a country to ensure the rapid supply of such drugs? First of all, we must promote research and development, and then quickly conduct the approval review of the developed drugs, and secure the drugs that have been approved. At present, there are two drugs approved in Japan for the treatment of COVID-19, and the government has moved to secure these drugs and has set up a distribution system for them. Similarly, for vaccines, we are working to secure the vaccine through research and development, establishment of a production system, and negotiations with pharmaceutical companies. The COVAX Facility, an international framework, is mainly for developing countries, but Japan will also use this framework to secure vaccines.

Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga has declared that Japan will secure enough vaccines to provide to all citizens by the first half of 2021. To this end, supply contracts with vaccine development companies are being progressively signed, and a bill to establish a system to promptly promote vaccination will be submitted to the extraordinary Diet session.

To date, the government has invested a large budget for research and development to respond to COVID-19, securing 148.1 billion yen in total for FY2020. The money will be used, for one, to develop treatments and vaccines, as well as antigens and antibodies for PCR testing and diagnosis. The budget is also used for medical devices such as extracorporeal membrane artificial lungs (ECMO). In addition, for the development of basic technologies, support is provided for projects such as the analysis of the genome of COVID-19 patient specimens under the title of "Creation of Innovative Infrastructure for Development of Medical Research". In addition, to improve the environment, we are providing financial support for the development of a testing system at the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, the establishment of a network for clinical research trials in Asia to strengthen international collaboration, and international frameworks such as the Coalition for Pandemic Preparedness Innovation (CEPI) and the Gavi Vaccine Alliance.

Until now, vaccines have typically been inactivated vaccines, but with COVID-19, new technologies such as messenger RNA and viral vectors are emerging. I believe that European and U.S. pharmaceutical companies are taking the lead in vaccine development using such technologies. At the same time, it is necessary to develop a domestic production system, and the government is providing support for this.

I would like to talk about our efforts to secure vaccines as quickly as possible. Normally, the approval of a therapeutic drug or vaccine is a "research and development - regulatory approval - production" process. However, that would take years, so with regard to the COVID-19 response, we are looking to shorten this period considerably by moving forward simultaneously with the process of obtaining approval and the process of setting up a production line. To support this, we have secured a supplemental budget and are providing support to expedite the process. We have secured 10 billion yen in the first supplementary budget and 50 billion yen in the second budget for vaccine research. In addition, in order to simultaneously improve the production system, we are spending 137.7 billion yen, which we call the Emergency Vaccine Development Project. Furthermore, the budget is being used for negotiations with overseas manufacturers who are currently ahead of us in vaccine development and for the purchase of syringes and syringes.

In particular, under the name of the Emergency Vaccine Production System Improvement Project, support is being provided to manufacturers that meet certain conditions through public solicitation for the establishment of production lines in Japan.

At present, we have signed basic agreements with two overseas pharmaceutical companies to secure vaccines. We do not know how many vaccinations will be required, but we have agreed that each company will supply enough vaccine for 60 million people, or 120 million doses, in the first half of 2021. In addition, just recently we signed an agreement with another manufacturer to supply 50 million doses by the first half of the next fiscal year.

In order to ensure a prompt supply of needed treatments and vaccines, it is important to have a strong cooperative relationship between the public, private sector, and academia. The three parties must communicate and share information on a daily basis. I believe it is important to prepare for future pandemics by repeating such efforts.

International industry-academia-government collaboration on infectious disease countermeasures and Japan's image and expectations from overseas

Mihoko Kashiwagura, Resident Representative, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Japan

Today, I would like to talk about the importance of international cooperation against novel coronavirus infections from both economic and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) perspectives.

At the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, we publish our progress on the SDGs every year, and for the year 2020, the statistics are all very sad for all of us at the Foundation. After two decades of steadily declining global poverty, this year, for the first time, it has begun to increase. The impression is that we have suddenly regressed to the poverty level of 10 years ago. In particular, looking at the situation of poverty among infants and toddlers under the age of 5, the results show that after halving over the past 30 years, it is expected to increase starting in 2020. There are also signs of an increase in stunted growth due to malnutrition. There are also very negative observations for other infectious diseases such as HIV and malaria, which are not new coronavirus infections. In terms of vaccine coverage, the first 25 weeks of 2020 show a 25-year regression. The results are disappointing not only for novel coronavirus infections, but also for various other areas of health care.

Amidst such a situation, the economic situation is said to be affected by the global economy shrinking by approximately 90%, with double the economic losses of the 2008 Lehman Brothers collapse. On the other hand, some predict that the economic loss will be 1,200 trillion yen despite the 1,800 trillion yen of economic stimulus measures that each country is now taking.

For the Gates Foundation, vaccines have been the main focus of our efforts, both for the SDGs and for economic recovery. Currently, developed countries with funds are the first to secure vaccines, and statistics show that approximately 138 trillion yen has been spent to secure these vaccines. An analysis shows that if negotiations had been conducted in accordance with international cooperation, including developing countries, the price could have been reduced to 1/13th of what it is today. In addition, while developed countries are able to secure 2.5 times as many vaccines per capita, developing countries are only able to secure about 14% of the vaccines for their population, creating a large disparity. According to other data, the number of deaths would be roughly twice as high if only developed countries supplied 2 billion doses of vaccine as if the entire world were supplied. These data clearly show the importance of international cooperation. The results of these analyses have reaffirmed the importance of building mechanisms and systems in accordance with international cooperation to deal with this new coronavirus infection and with AMR that may occur in the future.

In this environment, there is the Access to COVID-19 Tools (ACT) Accelerator, the world's only internationally coordinated mechanism for new coronavirus infection. Japan has participated in this mechanism since its inception. This mechanism is designed to ensure a fair and equitable supply of vaccines, therapeutic drugs, and test kits, including to developing countries. The goal is to supply 2 billion doses of vaccines to the world by the end of 2021, 245 million doses of therapeutics by the middle of 2021, and 500 million tests for test kits in low- and middle-income countries by the middle of 2021. The COVAX Facility for vaccines, among others, is a system under which developed countries, including Japan, can purchase vaccines from this facility, which is like the world's only buyer's club for vaccines covering the entire world.

So far, the Japanese government is said to have successfully implemented measures against novel coronavirus infection in Japan. On the other hand, Japan has so far demonstrated strong global leadership in the spirit of multilateralism. For example, Japan was the first developed country to announce its participation in the COVAX Facility. Since Japan was the first country to announce its participation in the COVAX Facility, more than 180 countries are currently participating in this facility. The COVAX Facility is a mechanism to secure vaccines for 20% of the Japanese population, and the Japanese government has decided to contribute US$130 million from its ODA budget to Gavi's Advance Market Commitment (AMC) for vaccines for developing countries. The government has decided to contribute $130 million from the ODA budget. In addition, the Japanese government has decided to contribute $98 million to CEPI, which is a push-type incentive for new coronavirus drugs. Thus, as an advanced country that recognizes the importance of multilateralism, Japan has been quick to participate in various initiatives and has created a trend toward international cooperation. I believe that the Japanese government has demonstrated strong leadership not only in domestic measures but also globally.

Industry's Approach to Infectious Diseases and Challenges

Mr. Joji Nakayama, Chairman, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, Inc.

I would like to talk about the pharmaceutical industry's efforts and challenges in dealing with infectious diseases.

First, I would like to talk about the efforts of the pharmaceutical industry to develop a cure and vaccine for COVID-19. In order to shorten the development period of therapeutic drugs, companies are conducting tests on so-called repositioning to see if compounds that have already been approved can be used. In vaccines, companies are working to shorten the time it takes to provide products by conducting basic research and non-clinical and clinical trials in parallel, or by building and preparing production facilities from a stage when the success or failure of development is not yet known. In addition, in the development and production of vaccines, it is known that in the case of COVID-19, it cannot be produced using the chicken egg method, so companies are working on the use of new modalities such as messenger RNA and DNA and new production methods.

Despite these efforts to provide therapeutic agents and vaccines as quickly as possible, there are still no new therapeutic agents or vaccines that have been reliably verified to be effective. Even if the new coronavirus infection is contained, another infectious disease will surely appear in the future. In order to effectively promote countermeasures against infectious diseases, including research and development of medicines, we believe that a command post function is necessary to plan and promote national strategies from a time of peace.

In addition, it should be able to coordinate relevant ministries and agencies, clearly communicate policies to local governments and medical institutions, and promote technological innovations, human resource development, and the stable supply of pharmaceuticals through cooperation between industry, academia, and government. It is also necessary to promote technological innovation through industry-academia-government collaboration, human resource development, and the development of infrastructure for production facilities and stable supply of pharmaceutical products. Another important function of the command post is to promote international collaboration with the United States and other countries.

Among the functions that the command post should have, we, as an industry, propose measures that are necessary for the research and development of therapeutic drugs and vaccines, as well as for the stable supply of these products. For example, nucleic acids and viral vectors using genetic recombination technology are being utilized in the research and development of vaccines. These are innovative modalities that have never been used before. In order to promptly put such innovations to practical use, it is necessary to promote research and development through industry-academia-government collaboration even in normal times.

In addition to COVID-19, various other infectious diseases are threatening our lives around the world. AMR is a particularly important issue. The reason why AMR is an important issue is that, in addition to the large number of deaths, AMR, unlike other infectious diseases, is a crisis that can be predicted to some extent and prevented. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have already listed the organisms of concern, and we believe that prioritizing research and development of new drugs for these organisms will help prevent AMR from becoming a serious social problem.

The number of newly developed antimicrobial agents has been on a steady decline since its peak in the 1980s. Recently, two companies that had obtained approval for new antimicrobial agents went bankrupt. This is indicative of the harsh market environment for antimicrobial agents today, especially for AMR, and private companies are not making progress in AMR. On the other hand, the threat of AMR has been growing in recent years with the emergence of bacteria resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents; if antimicrobial agents against AMR run out, in addition to direct deaths from infection, necessary surgery may not be performed due to warnings of postoperative infection.

In order to solve the current problem, the AMR Action Fund was established in July of this year with the participation of more than 20 pharmaceutical companies from around the world. The fund plans to raise a total of $1 billion (approximately 100 billion yen) from pharmaceutical companies, making it the largest project ever undertaken by the pharmaceutical industry. The fund will not only provide funding for venture companies, but will also provide R&D companies with expertise and know-how in development and commercialization. The goal is to bring two to four new antibacterial drugs to market over the next 10 years.

However, we believe that the effectiveness of this fund will be limited: even if a therapeutic drug for AMR is successfully developed, the use of that new antimicrobial will be restricted as much as possible in order to avoid creating the next drug-resistant strain. In order for AMR R&D to continue, we believe it is necessary to create an environment in which private companies can continue to develop AMR therapeutics by introducing unprecedented policies such as pull-type incentives. Specifically, a manufacturing and marketing approval reward system, a regular fixed price purchasing system, and a sales guarantee system could be considered. We hope that these systems will be introduced on a trial basis starting in FY2022, and if there are no problems with their operation, we would like to see them become law.

The AMR Action Fund alone has limitations in solving problems, but if pull-type incentives are introduced, private companies, especially venture companies, will become more active and continue to produce new antimicrobial agents. We believe that such a good cycle can be realized.

Panel Discussion

In this session, after the presentations on future countermeasures against infectious diseases from the standpoints of industry, academia, and government, the speakers moved on to a discussion in which they served as panelists.

Mr. Ryosuke Harada, editorial director of Nikkei Shimbun, moderated the session and discussed the speakers' proposals in depth and summarized the discussions as a session.

Panel Discussion

Future enhancement of infectious disease countermeasures through industry-academia-government collaboration For the Rapid Supply of Necessary Drugs and Vaccines

Moderator Mr. Ryosuke Harada, Editorial Writer, Nikkei Inc.
Panelists Mr. Kazuhiro Tateda, Mr. Tadaaki Shorobayashi, Ms. Mihoko Kashiwagura, Mr. Joji Nakayama, Chairman

Mr. Harada
The need for a command post function to shape national strategies against infectious diseases has been pointed out since peacetime. In light of the circumstances of this series of coronary disasters, what are your thoughts from the standpoint of the government and the national government on how Japan should produce medicines, vaccines, and diagnostic reagents?
Mr. Masabayashi

We have made plans in the past regarding how to respond in normal times. When the Immunization Law was revised in 2013, a council called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was established. The Basic Plan for Immunization prepared by the ACIP includes a considerable number of pages on vaccine research and development. The plan also points out the future direction in which vaccine research and development will be directed. In addition to that, the policy has been published each time there has been a shortage of vaccines or a growing public demand to promote research and development.

But what can we do as a country in the event of a pandemic such as this one? I think what we need most is a budget. We should collect a large amount of money for research and development, and give it to researchers and companies to work on development. In this case, a pathogen called the novel coronavirus has been identified, and we have been providing various kinds of support in the hope that a therapeutic drug and vaccine for this virus will be developed as soon as possible.

We have already provided one direction in our efforts to date, but if further leadership is required, we would like to proceed with our efforts while listening to everyone's opinions.

Mr. Harada
Do you have anything to add from the industry regarding the command post function?
Chairman Nakayama

In terms of the command post function in peacetime, we are thinking of the U.S. case. In the U.S., countermeasures against infectious diseases are part of the national security policy, and measures against bioterrorism, etc. are organized and taken even in normal times. In addition, the U.S. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) invests in the research and development of various companies to protect the United States against biochemical, radiological, and nuclear threats, as well as emerging infectious diseases. So, through such a system, we are accumulating sufficient information. By having such a system in place even during normal times, Japan will be able to retain information on new technologies and research and development as a nation, and will be able to forge strong alliances with overseas countries.

Another point is that corporate R&D activities in the field of infectious diseases have been slowing down. I have also heard that in the world of academia, it is difficult to develop young researchers and specialists. What will be important in the future is the constant presence of infectious disease specialists across a wide age range. I believe that strategies for human resource development can also be promoted through a command post function.

Mr. Harada
In addition to the current points, please give us your views from the standpoint of academia on how AMR measures should be tackled on an all-Japan basis.
Mr. Tatenda

How do we prepare for contingencies and how do we set up a peacetime system? This requires a perspective on how to perceive the current crisis. These discussions were expressed in the reflections at the time of the 2009 H1N1 influenza outbreak, and unfortunately they were not fulfilled, so we must rethink this. I believe that failure is not an option this time. Based on the experience of COVID-19 this time, it is very important to determine what we should do as a country from the perspective of crisis management, and to prepare from the peacetime stage in the context of experience and reflection.

This is our reflection, but there are only about 1,500 infectious disease specialists in Japan today. Unfortunately, there is a shortage of infectious disease specialists even at designated medical institutions. If we had systematically trained and deployed human resources, the situation might have changed. I would like to request the government to strategically consider such human resource development and utilization. When an emergency situation arises, local problems can be addressed with knowledgeable and experienced human resources at the core. Such a move can truly be considered in the context of cooperation between industry, academia, and government. This is true not only for COVID-19, but also for AMR and silent pandemic preparedness.

Mr. Harada

According to an analysis of the Japanese response to COVID-19 by the National Center for Global Health and Medicine issued at the end of September 2020, the number of severe cases has dramatically decreased since early June compared to March and April, and the number of infections among the elderly has also decreased. Based on this, I believe that at this point we can evaluate that the Japanese-type response is proceeding well, given the situation in Europe and the United States, where the second wave is now underway. How do you feel that this Japanese response to COVID-19 is viewed from overseas?

Mr. Kashiwagura

As you have pointed out, I think that measures in Japan are progressing well compared to the situation overseas. Other than that, what the Gates Foundation would like to express its appreciation for is the fact that, amid the rise of nationalism in aspects such as securing vaccines, the Gates Foundation recognized the importance of not only domestic measures but also global mechanisms such as the COVAX Facility and was quick to announce its participation in a multilateralism posture. The COVAX Facility has clearly taken shape as a pull-type incentive, and CEPI is beginning to be structured as a push-type incentive.

On the other hand, there remains a huge funding gap, for example, the ACT Accelerator as a whole is currently estimated to require 3.7 trillion yen. Against this backdrop, we are once again discussing how to address the funding needs. In fact, looking at the current economic situation, 3.7 trillion yen is equivalent to 10% of the monthly loss of the global economy, which is only the amount of one week's economic loss for the tourism sector in the G20. In light of these considerations, I believe that how to make allowance for financial needs related to infectious disease control will continue to be an important topic in the future.

This year's COVAX Facility was attended by more than 180 countries, creating a trend that can encompass the entire planet. Currently, 22 pharmaceutical companies from around the world have pledged to participate, but only two are Japanese companies. We hope that Japanese companies that are developing vaccines will look to this global mechanism as an opportunity to promote overseas development.

Mr. Harada
In terms of the competitiveness of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry, you mentioned that a strategic command post function would strengthen international collaboration. On the other hand, there is a view in society that vaccines are not readily available in Japan at this time. What is your viewpoint on how to enhance the competitiveness of the pharmaceutical industry in an all-Japan manner in the future?
Chairman Nakayama
In the area of therapeutic drugs, Japanese companies are making considerable progress in repositioning existing drugs. As for vaccines, it can be said that there has been a situation where there has been little need for development and production using new modalities in Japan. Globally, some of the vaccines that have come to the forefront are being commercialized at an accelerated pace as venture companies that have taken on the challenge of developing new vaccines connect with major companies. It is difficult to achieve exactly the same situation in Japan from the viewpoint of marketability, but what is important is for private companies to adopt such technological know-how from each other on a global scale and create a system that enables even Japanese companies to jump-start their business. To this end, if the Japanese government stands in between and works closely with U.S. government policy authorities that have information, I believe that it will be faster to catch up with technology in the event of a crisis.
Mr. Masabayashi

Currently, I feel that more and more countries in the world are putting their own countries first. It is really important to deal with global issues on a global scale, but we tend to think only of our own country. This time, Japan was one of the first countries to join the COVAX Facility, and I think this was due in large part to the fact that several senior officials of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare had experience working for the WHO, which enabled us to make a decision early on that vaccines should also be supplied to developing countries.

You mentioned earlier that only two Japanese companies are participating in the COVAX Facility, and I have the impression that many Japanese vaccine manufacturers start out in research laboratories and are a little less ambitious than overseas megapharmaceutical companies in acquiring overseas markets. I feel that if such awareness is fostered, they will be able to respond immediately when a system like the COVAX Facility is introduced.

Mr. Harada
You introduced pull-type incentives for the development of drugs and vaccines; could you give us more details?
Mr. Tatenda

If business principles work, development will proceed even if we remain silent. Not so with vaccines and drugs for resistant bacteria. In particular, since therapeutic drugs for resistant bacteria do not work based on business principles, the U.S. government is taking a leadership role in promoting such drugs, and this direction is being considered in Japan as well. What is attracting attention in this context is the debate on how to incorporate pull-type incentives, which is emerging from countries around the world. The United Kingdom, Sweden, and the United States are also setting directions using pull-type incentives. I think this is one important direction to be taken in international cooperation.

Chairman Nakayama

We have exactly the same idea. As a concrete example, two companies that developed antimicrobials in the US went bankrupt in 2019. This is a typical proof, but we do not want infectious disease drugs to be heavily used even if new drugs are released. Creating drugs that are not used as much as possible to prevent the emergence of resistant strains is not sustainable and not feasible in the normal business system.

International collaboration is especially important in the case of infectious diseases, but on the other hand, decoupling (fragmentation) has now begun, leading to a serious situation. For Japan, we must also have a sophisticated strategy. I think it is quite optimistic to think that international organizations will uniformly cover everything. I believe that it is extremely important to cooperate with a country that possesses strong pharmaceutical technology, which in my opinion is the United States, in order to acquire pharmaceuticals for the Japanese people in the future.

Mr. Harada
You mentioned that masks and medical devices cannot be produced in Japan and are dependent on China, or that raw materials are available in other countries, but what about bulk drugs for medicines?
Mr. Masabayashi
In the response to the new coronavirus, the typical example was masks, but I realized that these situations are not good for national crisis management: we cannot prepare them when demand increases, we do not have the raw materials in Japan, or we have to rely on imports from China due to a lack of production lines. I believe the same thing is happening in the world of therapeutic drugs. In particular, it is not good to be unable to set up a domestic production system in times of emergency. It is necessary to set up a system that can cover all the raw materials in Japan from a normal time.
Chairman Nakayama

Regarding the current problem of APIs, most of the current APIs are produced in China, India, and some in Europe. Moreover, APIs are intermediates, and various manufacturing processes are involved. It is a purely chemical world, and one in which the degree to which economies of scale can be achieved is the deciding factor. If you want to compete with this, it is difficult without very generous incentives. As an alternative, I think it might be possible to establish a system that allows Japanese regulatory authorities to take intermediary manufacturers into consideration and provide them with guidance on a regular basis.

Regarding infectious diseases, there is the problem that when they end, everyone quickly forgets about them again. Even though it has happened several times in the past, the same thing has happened again. I think we need to leave a clear formulation of what measures need to be taken to prevent it from happening again in the future. The Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of Japan (PMAJ) released its policy recommendations in June 2020. The pharmaceutical industry has not often made proposals of this kind in the past, but this time, as a member involved in healthcare, I strongly felt that we should make the Corona Disaster a turning point for the future of Japan.

  • As of December 2023
    The session can be viewed on the Nikkei Channel at .
    (Viewing available until November 5, 2021)

( Shinichi Sakai, Director, Public Relations Department)

Share this page

TOP