Patient Cooperation Committee The 1st Patient Organization Advisory Board

Printable PDF

The 1st Patient Organization Advisory Board (June 28, 2017): Exchange of opinions on expectations and requests to the pharmaceutical industry with newly appointed advisors

1. Report on the results of the "Questionnaire on Information on 'Diseases' and 'Drugs

After opening remarks by Ms. Chikako Kijima, Chairperson of the Patient Cooperation Committee, Mr. Masaya Takamoto, leader of the Task Force for Vision 2025 of the JPMA Patient Cooperation Committee, presented the results of the "Questionnaire on Information on 'Diseases' and 'Drugs'".
The "Questionnaire on Information on Diseases and Medicines" was designed to collect information on the current status of and requests for information on "diseases" and "medicines" from patients themselves and their supporting family members, as well as their opinions on "pharmaceutical companies' consultation services on medicines" and "clinical trials," in order to promote the realization of "patient-participatory medicine" as set forth in the JPMA Industrial Vision 2025. The survey was conducted from February 1 to 28, 2017, by mail and via the Internet, with the aim of ascertaining the current status of and requests for "disease" and "drug" information among patients themselves and their supporting family members, as well as their opinions about "pharmaceutical companies' drug consultation services" and "clinical trials. As a result, we received 391 responses (of which 375 were valid responses) from members of targeted nationwide patient organizations, their families, and related parties.
From the survey results, it was introduced that of the 375 respondents, 78.7% were patients themselves and 20% were family members, and that more than three-quarters were patients with intractable or rare diseases, among others, regarding "Patient Background.
About 70% of the respondents were satisfied with the information they received from doctors, patient groups, and the Internet regarding "information on diseases and treatments" and "information on medicines. In other words, about 30% of the respondents were not satisfied with the information they received. They were dissatisfied with inadequate explanations from doctors, were unsure what information they could trust on the Internet, and were seeking more information from public institutions.
Regarding awareness of the "Pharmaceutical Company's Consultation Service for Drugs" and its use, only 4% of the respondents used the service, but 62.7% of those who learned of its existence through this survey said they would like to use it in the future. The main opinions and requests from the respondents were that they were unaware of the existence of the "Pharmaceutical Companies' Pharmaceuticals Consultation Service," that they would like the service to be publicized, that they needed courage to call the service, that they did not know how to ask for help, and that they wanted the service to be polite and to explain things in an easy-to-understand manner. The above suggested the need to publicize the services of the "Pharmaceutical Company's Consultation Service for Pharmaceuticals" while clearly indicating what information they can provide.
We understood that the respondents were highly interested in all the information on "clinical trials". The Drug Evaluation Committee's Clinical Evaluation Subcommittee reported and made suggestions regarding "Clinical Trials.
The main opinion and request from the respondents to this survey and to the JPMA and pharmaceutical companies was that they want good drugs to be developed as soon as possible. We recognize that the development of innovative drugs is the starting point for JPMA member companies, and we are very happy that we were able to reconfirm the needs and opinions of patients through this survey. The results of the survey were also important for aligning the perspectives of all parties and committees toward the goal of patient-participatory medicine.

2. Proposals from the Drug Evaluation Committee

Next, Mr. Kazuhiko Kamiyama, a member of the Clinical Evaluation Committee of the JPMA Drug Evaluation Committee, gave a report and made a proposal titled "The First Step toward a Step Forward: Drug Development Based on Patients' Voices".
The Drug Evaluation Committee is a committee that examines issues in the development of drugs, and has launched the Patient Centricity TF in FY2016 with the idea of developing drugs that incorporate the voices of patients regarding clinical trials. The clinical trial-related part of the "Questionnaire on Information on 'Diseases' and 'Drugs'" conducted by the TF in FY2016 included a survey on awareness of the availability of information on clinical trials on public websites, whether or not they would like to know the results of clinical trials if they participated in them, their willingness to participate in efforts to reflect patient opinions in clinical trials, their interest in the drug development process, and so on. The results of the survey showed that the respondents were interested in clinical trials and drug development.
As a result, it was concluded that while there is a high level of interest in clinical trials and drug development and a desire to know specific information, there is not enough awareness of public information, and opportunities for participation in clinical trials and drug development are quite limited, and that more consideration should be given to reflecting patients' voices in the process. It was concluded that more consideration should be given to reflecting the voices of patients.
Although there is a strong perception that companies are hesitant to have direct contact with patients, it is considered important to incorporate Real Life Experience in the future, and some leading examples have already emerged in other countries. In the end, it is important for both parties to have a win-win relationship, and it is important to incorporate patients' voices from the early stage.
In TF, when considering win-win relationships for both parties, it is not about "patients' win" as the pharmaceutical industry thinks of it, but about whether it actually meets patients' needs, The TF requested that patient groups provide their opinions from such perspectives (see Table 2).

Table 2: Patients' and pharmaceutical companies' respective Wins

Comments from Advisors

  • What exactly do you define as the challenges to realize Win?
  • AMED is also considering inviting patients to participate in physician-led clinical research, but we should not just listen to what they have to say, we should consider the steps we want to take together to improve the situation.
  • Since the needs of patients and the needs of physicians are not always the same, I think that making patients aware of their needs could be included in Win.
  • When it comes to information related to clinical trials, there are times when even the language is not understood at the individual patient level. It is also important to consider how best to respond to this situation, especially in light of the fact that horizontal characters are not understood at all.
  • I hope that the development of drugs for children's diseases will also be promoted by incorporating the voices of patients.

3. "Activities, expectations and requests to the pharmaceutical industry, etc." of the organizations

(1) Mr. Shinsuke Amano, President, National Federation of Cancer Patients' Organizations (new advisor)

Mr. Shinsuke Amano, President of the National Federation of Cancer Patients' Associations (Zenganren), gave an introduction of his own activities, including activities prior to the establishment of Zenganren and the background leading up to its establishment.
I myself was diagnosed with malignant lymphoma in 2000, and joined the activities of "Group Nexus Japan," a malignant lymphoma patient organization, before becoming the chairman of ZENGANREN in 2015. Since 2000, patient groups have pointed out the problems of unapproved drug use (the so-called drug lag problem) and the issue of equalization of treatment, which led to the establishment of the Basic Act on Cancer Control in 2006.
I also served as a member of the Council for the Promotion of Cancer Control from 2009 to 2012, and together with five other patient committee members, we first addressed the issue of reducing the financial burden. At that time, patients were required to pay for outpatient treatment, and the second term patient committee members jointly requested that the maximum amount of high-cost medical care be approved for outpatient treatment, which was granted in FY2012. Considering the advent of today's expensive cancer drugs, patients would have been forced to bear a considerable burden if this certification had not been granted. In addition, we have been aware of the problem of drug lag since the first phase, and in particular, we requested the Council to address the issue of off-label drugs at that time, and I believe that this has led to the current expanded clinical trials.
Cancer patients are also actively involved in local activities. I also served as a member of the Okinawa Cancer Treatment Coordination Council and was involved in the issue of base hospitals for coordinated cancer treatment. Okinawa Prefecture has many remote islands, so geographical issues and financial problems for patients who have been hospitalized for cancer are major issues. Under an agreement with the prefecture, we have been providing financial support since 2013 for patients on remote islands who wish to undergo breast conservation.
Since there are various types of cancers and treatments, each type of cancer has its own patient association, and the actual situation in each region is different. Patient associations are supposed to raise their voices in accordance with their respective conditions, but we felt that we could not reach the common themes in cancer and the issue of medical costs by raising our voices in a scattered manner. The timing of the completion of the Second Stage Medical Care Plan in 2016 and the fact that the Diet was discussing the revision of the Basic Law on Cancer Control in a bipartisan parliamentary group led us to believe that it was necessary to create a coalition of cancer patient associations, and the Zenganren was established.
As our first activity, we collaborated with the Japan Council of Associations for Intractable Diseases and Disorders (JPA) to make requests. Initially, the federation submitted a written request, but the JPA gave us a suggestion and we held a press conference together with the JPA. Although it was not our intention from the beginning to focus mainly on request activities and policy advocacy, as a result, our request activities have become the main focus of our activities.
The revision of the Basic Law on Cancer Control was not an important theme for the national government, and its enactment was not expected, but we managed to get it passed just in time in December 2016 by sending individual questionnaires. The revised Basic Act on Cancer Control includes language stating that society as a whole should support cancer patients. In addition, since there is little support for rare and intractable cancers, the law also includes language regarding support for rare and intractable cancers. In addition, since we need to visualize the in-hospital cancer registry, we plan to collaborate with academic societies and other organizations in a project to provide easy-to-understand information to patients.
In terms of collaboration with academic societies, we are co-hosting a symposium with the Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine, and as a patient group we are participating in the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare's "Consortium for the Promotion of Cancer Genome Medicine. There are various problems for cancer patients, such as being denied insurance coverage if they have high-risk cancers, and we are making proposals on these issues as well.
Finally, regarding clinical trial information, I would like to point out that it is extremely difficult for patients to access clinical trial information at the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (JAPIC), and it is difficult for them to obtain the information they need.

(2) Ms. Ikuko Yamaguchi, President, COML (Certified NPO) (new advisor)

Ms. Ikuko Yamaguchi, President of COML, a certified non-profit organization, introduced the activities of the organization and talked about her expectations and requests to the pharmaceutical industry.
COML started its activities in 1990. At that time, it was taboo to tell cancer patients that they had cancer, and it took a lot of effort to know who they were. When a patient asked, "What is this medicine?" the answer was, "A white pill that you need." The attitude was, "A layman wouldn't know anyway, so it's okay if you don't want to know.
COML's activities began by asking such passive patients, "Is that OK with you? We started our activities with the idea that "patients and doctors should work together, not against each other" and that patients themselves should be "the protagonists of their lives" and "responsible for their bodies" and "be wise patients. We are not only leaving it up to the doctors, but we are also working with the idea that patients should "think about what efforts they can make" and "become patient citizens who can actively participate in treatment and make proposals to solve problems.
One of the specific activities is telephone consultation, in which non-medical staff members of COML have received approximately 58,000 consultations to date. COML staff, who are not medical professionals, have received about 58,000 calls so far, and they offer advice based on their true feelings, such as "I am feeling anxious because of the shift from inpatient to outpatient treatment. Recently, the number of patients with mental illnesses has been increasing, and we are working to accept the thoughts and feelings of these people and help them feel better. The average time per phone consultation is more than 40 minutes, sometimes exceeding one and a half hours.
The second activity is called "Patients' School," which started in January 1991. We also present topics, but the main focus is the exchange of opinions among participants, which we have done mainly through group discussions. Recently, the number of people who go out to speak, even if they have to spend money, has been decreasing. We believe this is due to the fact that we live in an age when information can be easily obtained on the Internet. Still, topics for which there are no answers or medical costs are not listed anywhere, so on the contrary, the number of participants tends to increase.
The third is the SP (Simulated Patient) activity, which we started in 1992. Objective clinical competency examinations, including medical interviews, have become mandatory in medical, dental, and pharmacy schools, and we are participating in medical education as a partner for medical interviews. trials began in FY2017 in response to the POST-CC-OSCE (Post Clinical Examination OSCE) starting in 2020. We are also involved in the hospital exploration program.
We are also involved in hospital expeditions. This activity was started in 1994 in order to improve hospitals from the viewpoint of patients, who are the users of hospitals, and to communicate the issues that hospitals face through actual hospital tours and visits. Recently, we have been approached by large hospitals such as Keio University Hospital and Chiba University Hospital.
In addition, since 2001, we have also been conducting workshops to improve patients' communication skills and help them become aware of their own problems. This is a program that we have developed independently, and recently we have been conducting it as a "Patient-Medical Staff Communication Course" so that medical staff can participate as well.
Apart from this, we also prepared a booklet entitled "10 Articles to See a Doctor" in the form of a draft at the request of the Ministry of Health and Welfare in 1997. The booklet was distributed by Kyodo News and 40,000 copies were printed, but the response from all over Japan was so great that the booklet ran out of stock within three months. In 2014, we also distributed 30,000 free copies of "10 Articles of Life and Body" for children.
In addition, COML also holds a "Citizens' Training Course for Medical Care Providers" to encourage participation in medical care by patient-citizens. We will continue to participate in various medical-related conferences. In the future, we plan to start training courses for general committee members for various medical-related conferences and a banked concept.
Lastly, as a request to pharmaceutical companies, we feel that the negative information and risks of pharmaceuticals are not being conveyed in a correct manner. We believe that it is important to eliminate concerns about drugs, such as excessive worry about side effects. It is also important to increase patients' information literacy. As a specific request, we would like pharmaceutical companies to clarify what they can and cannot do, and then make efforts to provide specific information on what they can do in terms of drug information.
In the future, we would like to actively engage in information provision activities at the Patient Information Center. For example, booklets and pamphlets from pharmaceutical companies are the most popular, and we are taking care to replenish them so that we do not run out. I would also like pharmaceutical companies to make industry-wide efforts to place their booklets and pamphlets in easily accessible places where patients can see them.

4. Exchange of opinions on the theme of the Patient Organization Seminar

The JPMA asked the advisors for their opinions on the theme of the annual patient group seminar. Chairperson Kijima explained at the beginning of the meeting that the TF of the Patient Group Seminar considers the following themes as candidates for the first part: employment of cancer patients in school, recruitment of patients with rare diseases for clinical trials, etc., and the second part: utilization of big data and real world data (RWD), iPS cells, genomic medicine, new medical technologies, and utilization of AI in medicine, etc. He then gave his opinions on these themes. The second part of the meeting was devoted to big data, real world data (RWD), iPS cells, genomic medicine, new medical technologies, and the use of AI in medicine.

Comments from Advisors

  • Information on iPS cells and genome-based medicine are frequently inquired about by patients, and this information has been rapidly changing over the past few years. There are also requests for information on medical policy topics.
  • We would like to have a place where we can learn about a wide range of topics, as we need people who can express opinions not only on specific diseases but also from a bird's eye view.
  • There are not enough opportunities to reflect the opinions of patients and their families.
  • Although there is an increase in the number of consultations regarding school enrollment and employment, it may be difficult for the JPMA to take up these issues.
  • In the area of oncology, as a leader of a patient group, I would like you to take up issues that we need to know about and systems that are being developed in the form of laws.
  • I think it is necessary to develop leaders who can properly express their opinions to various committees and government agencies. I would like you to cover topics related to the development of such leaders.
  • We would like you to include topics that patient groups need to know about in order to respond to such issues as the Personal Information Protection Law.

Closing Remarks

Finally, Mr. Tokuo Tanaka, Executive Director of JPMA, gave closing remarks.
We have asked five advisors, including two new members this year, and I think we are off to a good start. I think it is important for this committee to listen to the opinions of patients. I would like to ask for your continued support over the next two years," he concluded, closing the first meeting of the Patient Organization Advisory Board.

Patient Cooperation Committee Sohei Motoyama

Share this page

TOP